The Komi Republic can function on the international carbon market, as a federal constituent entity, under the condition that Russia is involved in the carbon market. Our region has a big volume stock. The total forest area in the Komi Republic is 38.9 mln. ha., where forest covered area – 30 mln. ha., and it makes 3,5% of All-Russian forests and about 50% of forests of the European North (e.g. boreal forests). Estimating the forest potential, we can be sure, that taking part in the carbon market can have only positive effect (e.g. the Appendix 2, picture 1). Analyzing the absorbing ability of the Komi Republic forests (e.g. 3,600 tons a year), if the current price is $ 15 per ton, the profit is $ 54 000 a year. While implementing joint projects, where cost of the unit is $ 10 a year, the profit for the Komi republic might 5 be $ 29, 500 a year. If we have the clean development mechanism (unit cost $ 17 a year), the profit is $ 50, 150. (e.g. the Appendix 3, tables 1-2). But we should take into account, that not all forest recourses of the Komi Republic might be included in the carbon market, because of the conditions, criteria of the carbon market. The mechanism of entering the market is not clear yet (e.g. carbonic deal participants; roles of the participants of carbonic deal; connections among participants).
To make the conclusion, it’s necessary to say, that our country, the Komi Republic, is ready to become a participant of the carbon market: we have the resources, we can plan production setups of this resource to the market. But lack of initiative and administrative mechanisms prevent Russia from taking part in the market. Though the Russian Federation could have extra profit, to decrease waste amount and to improve techniques and equipment, by means of attracting the foreign investors in forest industry. There’s the need of the efficient legislation, which doesn’t exist today.
Appendix 1: Diagram 1. Dynamics of the price development for reduction units in 2000-2012 –es(e.g. the European carbon market):
1 – брокеры – the brokers;
2 – the Government;
3 – the European Union;
4 – the forecast
Appendix 2: Picture. 1. Carbon project potential of the Komi Republic forestry cluster
Table 2
The Cruising Characteristics and Carbon Sequestration by the Forest Phytomass in the Komi Republic. The Carbonic Deal Participants and Their Roles.
The Pedigree Structure |
The Mean Age |
The Forest Covered Area, t./ha. |
The Total Reserve (t/m3) |
The Average Reserve, м3/га |
The Reserve Carbon in the Phytomass |
The Annual Storage Сarbon in the Phytomass |
Relation (ZC/ РС), % |
||||
Total (РС), th.t. |
t./ha. |
Total (ZC), th.t. |
t./ha. |
||||||||
1 ha. |
On total S |
1 ha. |
On com-mon S |
||||||||
6Е2С1Б1Ос |
140 |
29229 |
2855807 |
98 |
102957 |
35,2 |
27,4 |
50389 |
1,72 |
1,34 |
4,9 |
Table 2
The Cruising Characteristics and Carbon Sequestration by the Forest Phytomass in the Komi Republic. The Carbonic Deal Participants and Their Roles.
Units |
Including by the Reserve Carbon (PC) Gradations, t./ha |
Including by the Annual Storage Carbon (ZC) Gradations, t./ha. |
|||||||
3-39 |
40-47 |
48-55 |
56-110 |
0,4-3 |
3,1-3,5 |
3,6-4 |
4,1-6 |
||
29,229 |
th. ha. |
22,602 |
3,891 |
1,036 |
1,699 |
2,277 |
26,951 |
- |
- |
100 |
% |
77 |
13 |
4 |
6 |
92 |
8 |
- |
- |